Ploughing And Lodgement Of A Clast

Evidence From Micromorphology


Poster by Andrew Evans, of the University of Leeds, School of Geography.

Please feel free to email any comments.

The micromorphological slides shown would unfortunately take up too much memory space to present here at the present time at a resolution that would do them justice.


The broad structure of the poster is...


Introduction

The glacial history of the Lleyn Peninsular, North Wales, is still a matter of some controversy. It is unclear whether there are sediments from one or two glaciations preserved in the area. Saunders (1968) suggested that two glaciers over-rode the area depositing two tills. Boulton (1977) has suggested in the East of the peninsula that the upper of the two diamicts is a meltout-then-flow till associated with the ice depositing the lower till. In the West of the area diamicts and gravels / sands have been variously interpreted as glaciomarine (Eyles and McCabe, 1989) and flow tills (McCarroll and Harris, 1992). A small number of preliminary samples were taken to assess thin sectioning techniques, and these were selected from interesting features of several deposits on the peninsula so as to serve a dual purpose. This study looks at a deposit close to that studied by Boulton near Criccieth, in particular looking at one section of the boundary between the 'flow' till and the lodgement till beneath. It is suggested that the unusual feature sampled at this boundary was formed in the late stages of clast lodgement into the lower till and that it may throw some light on both the history of the area and the mechanism of large clast deposition.

Location of Samples

Samples were taken from a hillock of till on the East side of Criccieth, between the town and the sea caves (SH 508382). The mound has been described elsewhere as a 'drumlin' purely on the basis of its form. Samples were taken from an area of alternating blue and yellow silts and small (<5cm) iron stained sand lenses on the lower till side of the boundary between two proposed glaciogenic diamicts. The mixed sediment zone extended some 2m and was ~50cm high. It was associated with a boulder to the immediate West and a resistant band in the lodgement till 20cm beneath which extended some 15m East. A landslip made mapping to the West hard, but immediately West of the boulder the blue till left the top of the erratic and fell West. This suggests the feature does not extend to the West of the boulder. Regionally the ice moved East to West, though the deposit is at the head of two North - South valleys which may have contained small glaciers.


Analysis

Two thin sections were prepared from the zone, unfortunately these were from only one (West-East) plane. The sections showed that the alternating banding was the result of interbedding of three sedimentary types -

There were no boundaries found between the different bodies which were shear zones and in places the boundaries were erosional. This suggests deposition was by flow. In places there was simple shear where boundary irregularities produced friction and in other places fabrics could be seen moving into the topography of lower sediment bodies.

The sediment bodies were deposited in consistent relationships. The sands were deposited in bands with little or no silt in the pore spaces, suggesting the flow of clean water. They were also weakly aligned horizontally. In the one place the sands were overridden by silts they were mixed together in a 4.3mm zone. In places in this zone slugs of silt were armoured with sand grains suggesting the edge of flow units. While it was impossible to determine the true flow direction of these features it was apparent from associated extensional features and folding that they did not flow West - East.

The quartz grains were found throughout all the other bodies except the sands, suggesting they may have winnowed out of these in a water body. The grains were prevalent at body boundaries suggesting fallout deposition between events. However, they also formed units of just quartz which moved with the surrounding flows and filled veins.

The silts were found in three types of bodies...

The latter category is the most interesting as it was unexpected in this environment (either two overriding tills or a till and massive flow above). The fact that the larger grain sizes are above the fine silts in each 'bed' suggests these are not water formed features. While it is possible to suggest that the units with this architecture were inverted in transport, a progression can be found which supports a non-fluvial origin for these features. Some areas show low strain fracturing of coarse units (fine grained quartz bed?) into lenses along listric faults. In the more developed features remnants of these can be seen to bound the lens like external structure. This process causes the observed juxtaposition of fine and coarse material.

It can be suggested that free-water movement through the coarse beds away from or to the particle reorientation zones of the listric faults allows a single fault to form. This is in contrast to the post-faulting situation in which flow is reduced along the coarse layer and stress leads to increased pore water pressure / reduced effective pressure close to shearing areas and, therefore, more pervasive movement / a wider shear zone. This provides the pervasive movement necessary to give the 'graded' appearance of the bed. The alternative is that these represent flow noses, with the larger grains being extruded to the surface.


Synthesis

There are a fixed number of possible environments for the formation of this interbedded feature. These are combinations of...

Plainly there are a large number of possible processes that could form the feature, however, on the basis of the sediments and the macroscale form they have been whittled down to two...

Clast gouge and lodgement induced meltout.

  1. The boulder gouges through the (older) lodgement till.
  2. Pore pressure infront of the clast increases until the sediment yields or faults. Dewatering occurs and fluidized mud moves along clast caused microfaults and is extruded into the low pressure zone behind the clast. This is joined by till flows from the sides of the gouge. These processes formed the blue till layer above the resistant layer.
  3. A combination of pore water removal or regelation refreezing and sediment compaction eventually lodge the clast.
  4. The pressure of the ice on the clast causes pressure melt and water fills the gouge behind the clast. Meltout debris intermittently mixes with the reworked lower till. Smaller quartz grains rain out slower.
  5. Lodgement of the upper till (the ice carried debris) continues.
Problems - How do the aligned, clean, sand bodies form? I am loathed to resort to ice frozen blocks of channel sand.

Pressure pumping of sediments.

  1. Water pressure variations in distant till pump material from one lodgement till down shear zones and into the other lodgement till or the ice (for mechanism see Talbot and von Brunn, 1987).
  2. This mix of basal till and ice melts, fluids preferentially moving through and washing the sands. Quartz grains represent till bodies with fines removed where escape could not occur through sands.
Macroscale fabrics make it unlikely that simple meltout without reworking was a significant factor in the deposition of the whole of the upper till and similar fabrics are not found anywhere else in the deposit. Therefore my inclination is to the former of the two explanations though local meltout may have been significant (see Boulton, 1977). The amount of meltout material in this case would be expected to increase as the clast became lodged and, if we take the resistant layer seen in the field extending East from under the clast as a consolidation trace of the path of the lower part of the clast, we see that this is what happened. The ice pushing the clast East to West and lodged it against a massive till lump, with meltout producing the mixed zone only in the very last stages.

In reference to the fluvial nature of the sediments it should be noted that it is difficult to see how the lower lodgement till would be found in such a prominence in the feature if it was formed simply from eroded layers of the (overconsolidated) lower till combined with water born sands and sediments in the early stages of flow slumping. One must also remember that this feature is inextricably included in the lower lodgement till.

This interpretation of the deposit could be strengthened or refuted through an examination of the blue till above, below and within the resistant layer, as the expected sediment changes in each area are easily estimated.


The Deposition Controversy

With further study this feature, and the other structures at the unusual boundary between the two diamicts, should throw some light on the controversial nature of the upper till. The inferences that can be drawn from the work so far and avenues of further research are outlined below.

For one glaciation... The fact that the feature's silt and clay fabrics have not been altered since deposition suggests that the feature has not been subjected to glacial loading. However, the alignment of the sands (which might be expected to dewater first under stress) may hint at loading. The sand alignment would then be the equivalent of the small number of long shear zones which cross sediment body boundaries in the thin sections. This could be studied in a triaxial loading rig, comparing loading reorientation with the observed fabrics.

For two glaciations... Boulton's model for the area relies on a vertical change in debris type up through the ice to explain the difference in sediment between the lodgement till and overlying flow till. The later was claimed to have partly melted out of stagnant debris rich ice and partly formed of reworked lodgement till. If it can be shown that the yellow material in the interbedded area is the same as that above (and on the basis of the presently available thin sections of both, there is nothing to suggest that it is not) there must have been a horizontal change in the sediment at the very base of the ice from the blue lodgement till to the yellow till above. In this structure it can be seen that the ice was active when this sediment was deposited. However, this is wild speculation and simple 'colour' is hardly a reliable indicator of sediment type. It would be reckless to go any further than this at present until the nature of the upper till and the yellow silts in the mixed area can be examined in more accurate mineralogical detail.


References

Boulton, G.S. 1977. A multiple till sequence formed by a late Devensian Welsh ice-cap: Glanllynnau, Gwynedd. Cambria, 4, 10-31.

Eyles, N. and A.M.McCabe. 1989. The late Devensian Irish Sea Basin: the sedimentary record of a collapsed ice sheet margin. Quaternary Science Reviews, 8, 307-351.

McCarroll, D. and C.Harris. 1992. The glacigenic deposits of Western Lleyn, North Wales: terrestrial or marine? Journal of Quaternary Science, 7, 19-29.

Saunders, G.E. 1968. A reappraisal of glacial drainage phenomena in the Lleyn peninsula. Proceedings of the Geologists Association, 79, 305-324.

Talbot, C.J. and V.von Brunn. 1987. Intrusive and extrusive (micro)melange couplets as distal effects of tidal pumping by a marine ice sheet. Geological Magazine, 124, 513-525.

Jump to...